Legal Opinion
Meatley v. Artuz
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1995No. 93 CV 5541PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge:
John Meatley brought this pro se action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1987 conviction in Queens County Supreme Court for attempted murder, robbery, assault and criminal possession of a weapon.
In his petition Meatley says that he was denied due process because (1) the trial court “refused to suppress all statements attributed to him,” (2) the trial court “refused to suppress all identification testimony” pertaining to him, (3) the trial court denied him his right to be present when it answered a note from the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Salvador Galdamez v. John P. Keane, Warden, Superintendent of State Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Darius Morgan v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Roldan v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Copeland v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Avincola v. StinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.