Legal Opinion

Roldan v. Artuz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 6, 2000No. 97CIV.2562(DAB)(AJP)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BATTS, District Judge.

On July 22, 1999, Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck issued a Report and Recommendation. The Petitioner filed an objection on July 29, 1999. Magistrate Judge Peck denied Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition on the merits.

The Court has reviewed the Plaintiffs objection, which disputes no specific proposed finding or recommendation. The Court finds Petitioner’s objection to be without merit. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error on the face of the record, the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Peck are hereby accepted and the Report and…

2Cases cited142 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Douglas v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Velazquez v. PooleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  4. Jones v. DuncanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API