Legal Opinion

Avincola v. Stinson

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 9, 1999No. 97 CIV 1132(SAS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I have duly considered petitioner’s Objections, dated May 17, 1999, to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck, dated March 19, 1999, and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, I hereby accept and adopt the thoughtful and extremely thorough Report and Recommendation in full and dismiss the above-referenced habeas petition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PECK, United States Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner Luis Avincola seeks a writ of habeas corpus from his…

2Cases cited153 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Johnson v. RenicoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  3. Jones v. DuncanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. United States v. WycheDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  5. Bond v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API