Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Boring Furs, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1976PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action for the conversion of mink pens which plaintiff contends are personal property and which defendant contends are fixtures and therefore a part of the real property which he acquired as purchaser. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The pens or cages in question and the sheds which house them were used in the operation of the Marsh farm before it was sold. The pens were arranged in batteries which were suspended within the sheds by means of nails, wires or staples. In the regular operation of the mink farm it is necessary from time to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Messenger Publishing Co. v. Allegheny County Board of Property AssessmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. State Highway Commission v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. DEAN VINCENT, INC. v. Redisco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Nendels-Medford Joint VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1991
  2. Johnson v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Far West Modular Home Sales, Inc. v. ProapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. West Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1985
  5. Bylund v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API