Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Feves

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The State of Oregon through its Highway Commission commenced this action on October 22, 1959, by filing a complaint for the condemnation of a parcel of land in the city of Portland on which was located a multiple storied furnished apartment house owned by the defendants.

The defendants filed an answer to the complaint in which they alleged that the fair cash market value of the real property sought to be acquired, together with improvements, furniture, and furnishings and fixtures was $185,000.

Thereafter the parties entered into two stipulations in writing by which they agreed “as a matter of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Evans v. OckershausenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. First State & Savings Bank v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Helm v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cereghino v. State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Johnson v. Northwest Acceptance CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Godfrey v. HemenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Marsh v. Boring Furs, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API