Legal Opinion

Bylund v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided May 18, 1981No. TC 1297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLISLE B. ROBERTS, Judge.

The Director of Assessment and Taxation for Lane County, Oregon, appealed from the Department of Revenue’s Order No. VL 78-668, dated November 22, 1978, which held that the intervenor in this suit, Teleprompter Corporation, was not liable to the county for real or personal ad valorem property taxes on certain cable television “housedrops” utilized in Teleprompter’s business. The order cancelled the 1977-1978 property tax assessment imposed upon the house-drops and required the county to amend the tax roll and to refund any excess taxes which may have been paid on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weiss v. WeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Shields v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Roseburg Nat. Bank v. CampOregon Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Salem, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1987
  2. Schultz v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API