DEAN VINCENT, INC. v. Redisco, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is a contest for priority between secured creditors. It arises out of the building of an apartment house. The plaintiff holds a first mortgage on the real property. The defendant Eedisco, Inc., holds a conditional -sales contract and a second mortgage for the price of the floor coverings and the installation charges therefor. From a decree according priority to the plaintiff’s mortgage, Eedisco appeals.
There were a number of other parties and issues in the suit, but they are all peripheral to the question presented here. The first question is whether installed wall-to-wall carpeting can…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roseburg Nat. Bank v. CampOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Joiner v. PoundNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Doll v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- State Highway Commission v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Plough v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marsh v. Boring Furs, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State Highway Commission v. Empire Building Material Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Far West Modular Home Sales, Inc. v. ProapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Builders Appliance Supply Co. v. A. R. John Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Martin v. McCaigeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.