Dahrooge v. Rochester German Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by George Dahrooge and Maggie Dahrooge against the Rochester-German Fire Insurance Company upon a policy of insurance. Judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.
A judgment was rendered against plaintiffs and appellants in this case on a directed verdict, for the reason that the action was not begun until several months had elapsed after the expiration of one year from the time of the fire which it was claimed destroyed property of plaintiffs covered by the policy of insurance upon which suit was brought. Plaintiffs are husband and wife and resided on Wealthy avenue in the city of Grand Rapids, Mich., *444where they also conducted, in a portion of their residence, the business of manufacturing silk garments. They had resided there and been so engaged for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steen v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Hamilton v. Royal Insurance Co. of Liverpool, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Blanks v. Hibernia InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- McFarland & Steele v. Peabody Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
- Law v. New England Mutual Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- McDonald v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Appeal of Computer Systems of America, Inc., Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.