Legal Opinion

Rural Metro Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 1999No. 2 CA-IC 99-0003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner/employer Rural Metro Corp. and petitioner/carrier Reliance Insurance Co. challenge the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) award finding respondent/employee Martha Defore Porterfield’s 1 injury claim against Rural Metro compensable. 2 We affirm the award.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 We view the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to sustaining the award. Faraghar v. Industrial Comm’n, 184 Ariz. 528, 911 P.2d 534 (App.1995). The following facts were adduced during a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Appleby v. Belden Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Inch v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Allen v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau InsArizona Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API