Legal Opinion

Grammatico v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 15, 2004No. 1 CA-IC 01-0117Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 P.3d 211 (2004)

208 Ariz. 10

David C. GRAMMATICO, Petitioner,

v.

The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent,

AROK, Inc., Respondent Employer,

State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

No. 1 CA-IC 01-0117.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

May 20, 2004.

As Amended June 15, 2004.

Jerome, Gibson, Stewart, Friedman, Stevenson & Engle, P.C., By Joel F. Friedman, Phoenix, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Laura L. McGrory, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, Attorney for Respondent.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, By Charles G. Rehling, Phoenix, Attorneys for Respondents…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API