Legal Opinion

Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 25, 2007No. 95,796PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.;

This case arises from a summary judgment ruling that permanently enjoined Coleman Company, Inc., from licensing its name in the recreational vehicle industry. In order to prevent inequity, Kansas courts have found, under an alter ego theory, that a subsidiaiy corporation can bind its parent. The issue of whether one corporation is but an instrumentality of another is a question of fact. Because of the parent corporation’s extensive control over its subsidiaiy in this case, we hold that the grant of summary judgment must be reversed. We reject the three other claims raised by Coleman…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rose v. Spa Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Brenner v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Iola State Bank v. BiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hill v. Ricoh Americas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Uhlmann v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Larkin v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Larkin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2016
  5. Sheldon v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API