Legal Opinion
Hill v. Ricoh Americas Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 19, 2010No. 09-3182PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Phillip Hill sued Ricoh Americas Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, alleging that he was terminated from his position at Ricoh in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), see 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, and Kansas common law prohibiting retaliatory discharge. 1 Five months after suit was filed, Ricoh moved to stay the case and compel arbitration under the arbitration clause in its employment agreement with Mr. Hill. The district court denied the motion on the ground that Ricoh’s delay in demanding arbitration after engaging in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- BOSC, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Alwert v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Sanchez v. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Healy v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- D'ANTUONO v. Service Road Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.