Legal Opinion

Uhlmann v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 3, 2012No. 105,147PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Robert Uhlmann guaranteed die debt of a failed business. A jury decided that Jay and Cynthia Richardson did too, though drey had denied having done so. When the business failed, Uhlmann paid the remaining business debt and then sued the Richardsons for their share under two legal tiieories, contribution and unjust enrichment. The trial judge submitted die unjust-enrichment claim to a jury, and the jury ruled in Uhlmann’s favor.

The Richardsons have appealed, claiming that the unjust-enrichment claim shouldn’t have been submitted to a jury at all. We agree with them that only die more…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Harsch v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. In Re GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  4. Robinson v. City of Wichita Employees' Retirement Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Redmond v. Brooke Holdings, Inc. (In re Brooke Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  3. In re the Marriage of TrasterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. Heartland Presbytery v. The Presbyterian Church of Stanley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API