Legal Opinion

CHELF v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 23, 2011No. 103,450PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

James Chelf appeals from the district court’s decision to summarily dismiss his personal injury claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because he failed to timely exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit. For the reasons stated below, we find the district court erred in summarily dismissing Chelf s claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because, although it is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a civil suit that must be strictly enforced by the court, the exhaustion requirement set forth in K.S.A. 75-52,138 is not jurisdictional.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. Ryser v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. DelacruzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  5. Oxy USA, Inc. v. Red Wing Oil, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API