Legal Opinion

Rose v. Spa Realty Associates

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1977PublishedCited by 336 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Breitel.

Plaintiffs, planners of an extensive housing development on land in Saratoga Springs purchased from defendants, seek specific performance of an oral agreement to modify the written agreement of sale. The modification reduced the quantity of the land to be conveyed as a first stage under the written agreement. Supreme Court, after a nonjury trial, ordered that the lesser quantity be conveyed to plaintiffs upon payment in full in cash. From an order of the Appellate Division modifying the judgment to allow plaintiffs to purchase the lesser quantity on credit terms, defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Thomson v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by336 opinions

  1. Dallas Aerospace, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Cis Air Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  4. Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v. Tocqueville Asset Management, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal CraftersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

331 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API