Legal Opinion
West v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 1994No. D020635PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
This action arises out of the sale of a house by Michael and Mary West to Wayne and Beverly Willerth. Willis M. Allen Company (Willis Allen) and two of its agents represented the parties in the sale. The Willerths sued the Wests, Willis Allen and the agents. After having prevailed on a summary judgment motion on the basis of a statute of limitations bar, the broker defendants settled with the Willerths for a waiver of costs. The Wests seek a writ of mandate after the court granted a motion for determination of good faith settlement and dismissed their cross-complaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Nak Sealing Technologies Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Field v. Century 21 Klowden-Forness RealtyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sehulster Tunnels/Pre-Con v. Traylor Brothers, Inc./Obayashi Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.