Legal Opinion
Wilfred Rattigan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 13, 2015No. 13-5374PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Wilfred Rattigan claims that FBI supervisors whom he had formally accused of discrimination retaliated against him by sending the FBI’s Security Division a memo purporting to demonstrate that he posed a security risk. On a previous appeal, we held that Rattigan could prevail only by showing “that agency employees acted with a retaliatory or discriminatory motive in reporting or referring information that they knew to be false.” Rattigan v. Holder (“Rattigan II”), 689 F.3d 764, 771…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Juanita GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON CONVENTION CENTER, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Wilfred Rattigan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Rattigan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Webster v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Horsey v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Njang v. Whitestone Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Craig v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.