Legal Opinion
Rattigan v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 3, 2011No. 10-5014PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
In this case, a jury found that the FBI violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by launching a security investigation of plaintiff, then an agent in its Saudi Arabia office, in retaliation for his filing of a discrimination complaint. On appeal, the government argues that plaintiffs claim is nonjusticiable under Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit case law because adjudicating Title VII liability called for the jury to second-guess security judgments committed by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wilfred Rattigan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Njang v. Whitestone Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bailey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wilfred Rattigan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.