Legal Opinion

Department of the Navy v. Egan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1988No. 86-1552PublishedCited by 659 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

Respondent Thomas M. Egan lost his laborer’s job at the Trident Naval Refit Facility in Bremerton, Wash., when he was denied a required security clearance. The narrow question presented by this case is whether the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) has authority by statute to review the substance of an underlying decision to deny or revoke a security clearance in the course of reviewing an adverse action. The Board ruled that it had no such authority. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote, reversed. We granted certiorari because of the importance of the issue in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by659 opinions

  1. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

654 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API