Legal Opinion

Bates v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 10585PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from the defendant for an alleged libel. A demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment for costs was thereupon entered for the defendant, from which judgment this appeal was taken.

It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff was, and is, what is generally known and termed a “publicity agent”; that by her perseverance, endeavors and ability she had created and built up a lucrative business as such publicity agent; that on or about October 31, 1927, the defendant, an attorney at law, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Maynard v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Kapellas v. KofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Okun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API