Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1933No. Docket No. 7790PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

On the day of trial of the action arising out of plaintiff’s complaint for damages based on an alleged libel, defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on behalf of plaintiff on the ground that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The objection was sustained and plain tiff’s motion for leave to amend was denied. From the judgment thereafter entered plaintiff has appealed.

To save expense the objection referred to was made prior to the impanelment of a jury, on stipulation of the pallies.

The complaint alleges in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Jones v. Express PubLishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Eva v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Milliken v. ValenciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Information Control Corporation v. Genesis One Computer Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Locke v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Golden North Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Tanana Publishing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API