State Ex Rel. Uhlman v. Melton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
This appeal is presented upon an agreed statement of facts which contains, inter alia, the following:
By ordinance No. 17376, the city council increased the business and occupation tax to persons engaged in the telephone business and to persons engaged in the distribution and sale of natural gas within the city of Tacoma.
By ordinance No. 17373, the city council increased license fees to persons engaged in certain businesses, trades, and occupations within the city of Tacoma.
These ordinances will hereinafter be referred to as the service tax ordinance and the license tax ordinance, respectively.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lundgren v. KierenWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Kerley v. WetherellIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Earley v. BatchelorWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Aad Temple Building Ass'n v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- San Juan Fedalgo Holding Co. v. Skagit CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- SAN JUAN FIDALGO HOLDING v. Skagit CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- McCormick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Paxton v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Paxton v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.