Legal Opinion

San Juan Fedalgo Holding Co. v. Skagit County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 2, 1997No. 38591-7-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kennedy, A.C. J.

San Juan Fidalgo Holding Company delivered its land use petition to the Skagit County Auditor’s Office approximately 20 minutes after the office had closed on the last day of the 21-day service period for commencing land use appeals under the Land Use Petition Act, ch. 36.70C RCW. Efforts to locate the county auditor for purposes of service before midnight were unsuccessful. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the petition and award attorney fees on appeal to the respondents. "Normal office hours” under RCW 4.28.080(1) are the hours that an auditor’s office is open to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Union Bay Preservation Coalition v. Cosmos Development & Administration Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Union Bay Pres. Coal. v. COSMOS DEVELOP.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Overhulse Neighborhood Ass'n v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Prekeges v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API