Legal Opinion

Paxton v. City of Bellingham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 2005No. 55019-5-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*441¶1 Tim Paxton, Sharon Crozier, and Larry Williams (collectively Paxton) appeal the trial court’s decision denying their request for a writ of mandamus compelling the election officials to place the “Ban Power Boats Initiative” (Initiative) on the November 2004 city of Bellingham election ballot.1 Paxton also argues the trial court abused its discretion in allowing Lake Whatcom Stewardship Association (LWSA) and Robin Williams’ request to intervene and denying additional time for rebuttal argument at the show cause hearing. We conclude the City did not have a legal duty to place the Initiative…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stafne v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Ahmad v. Town of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. SESSOM v. MentorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Sessom v. MentorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Stafne v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API