Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Earley v. Batchelor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1942No. 28905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

The facts as set forth in the pleadings and supporting affidavits on which this case was submitted to the superior court by agreement, without the introduction of evidence, are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows:

There is to be elected on November 3, 1942, a commissioner of the port of Seattle. On Saturday, October 3, at four o’clock p. m., Harry J. Martin called at the office of the secretary of the port commission to file his petition of nomination for the position. He was unable to do so as the office had closed at noon. That was its customary closing time, established over a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Griffin v. DingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Seawell v. GiffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Anderson v. FalleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Daniels v. CavnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Burns v. LacklenMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Koella v. State Ex Rel. MoffettTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Silides v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Kusler v. SinnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API