Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Board of Assessors of Medfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 12, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board, which affirmed the refusal of the board of assessors of Medfield (board) to abate the tax assessed on real estate owned by Ellen L. Parkinson. We conclude that the conservation easement granted by Parkinson, which placed substantial restrictions on the future development of her land, was invalid and unenforceable. Consequently, the board correctly refused to consider those restrictions when it assessed the value of her property.

Ellen L. Parkinson was the owner of three parcels of land, totalling 82.17 acres, in Medfield. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Allen v. DuvallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. McHale v. TreworgyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Vrabel v. Donahoe Creek Watershed AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Dunlap Investors Ltd. v. HoganArizona Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parkinson v. Board of Assessors of MedfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Highway Properties v. Dollar Savings BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. DRD Enterprises, LLC v. FlickemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Drd v. Aventure EstatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Haugh v. SimmsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API