Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Ernul

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1971No. 61PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Does Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 1, the “rightaway deed,” expressly grant to plaintiffs a twenty-foot right-of-way over the lands of defendant Fred Ernul? If not, are plaintiffs entitled to a way of necessity over said lands ? Answers to these questions are determinative of this controversy.

Even if its execution by Fred Ernul is duly proven, the paperwriting designated Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 1 is insufficient to expressly grant an easement. While no particular words are necessary for the grant of an easement, the instrument must identify with reasonable certainty the easement created…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Collins v. Asheville Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Allen v. DuvallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Woodring v. SwieterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API