Legal Opinion

DRD Enterprises, LLC v. Flickema

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2010No. 25595PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Appellant DRD Enterprises, LLC commenced a declaratory action against Todd and Dawn Flickema (Flicke-mas) and PSC Properties, LLC to obtain an access easement across their properties. DRD based its claim upon a “Blanket Easement” granted by Dakota Resorts Management Group (Dakota Resorts), a prior owner of Flickemas’ and PSC’s properties. The circuit court concluded that the Blanket Easement sufficiently described the servient tenement. Nevertheless, the court entered judgment for Flickemas and PSC because the court concluded that they were good faith purchasers without…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. DeshotelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Matney v. OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Patrice Diane Greer v. St. Louis Regional Medical Center, Also Known as St. Louis Connectcare, Also Known as ConnectcareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tolle v. LevSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Nicolay v. StukelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Johnson v. SellersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. TrancyngerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hall v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API