Dunlap Investors Ltd. v. Hogan
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
This is an appeal from the summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of appellee, Catherine M. Hogan. The effect of the summary judgment was to establish Hogan’s right to a parking easement on appellant Dunlap Investor’s real property. From that judgment, Dunlap appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer the following questions on appeal:
1. Was the description of the easement in the instant case so vague as to be unenforceable against an innocent third party?
2. Does knowledge by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bowen v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Keeler v. HakyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jerman v. O'LEARYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Williamson v. PVORBIT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Arizona Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Highway Properties v. Dollar Savings BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.