Legal Opinion
Allen v. Duvall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 5, 1984No. 437PA83PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
We granted discretionary review in this case to consider the single question: Was the language quoted above in the 7 October 1914 deed to W. S. McCracken, predecessor in title to defendants, sufficient as a matter of law to create by express reservation the appurtenant easements claimed by plaintiffs?
We hold that it was sufficient and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case for reinstatement of the judgment of the trial court.
The Court of Appeals based its opinion upon the premise that this Court’s opinion in Borders v. Yarbrough, 237 N.C. 540, 75…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Thompson v. . UmbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Century Communications, Inc. v. Housing Authority of Wilson & Site, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- King v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Brown v. Weaver-Rogers Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.