Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum, and Order 1
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability (Doc. # 73). Plain tiffs in this suit allege that the Division I members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”), in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (the “Sherman Act”), have conspired to limit the maximum compensation they will pay to one category of basketball coaches, the “restricted earnings coaches.” Defendant argues that the agreement at issue here — NCAA Bylaw 11.02.3, adopted in January 1991— does…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- In Re NCAA I-A Walk-On Football Players LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2005
- Wilson v. Ampride, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.