Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ampride, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 2, 2012No. MDL No. 1840; Case No. 07-1840-KHVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs’ KCPA And Unjust Enrichment Claims (Doc. # 2705) filed November 1, 2011. Defendants argue that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Kansas law specifically authorizes the sale of motor fuel without disclosing or adjusting for temperature and because Kansas law prohibits using automatic temperature compensation (“ATC”) at retail. They also argue that the undisputed facts establish that defendants have not willfully concealed,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alan Brown v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Delcavo v. Tour Resource Consultants LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Matthew Short v. LKQ Pick Your Part Central, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Tomes v. LoanCare, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023