In Re NCAA I-A Walk-On Football Players Litigation
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) (Dkt. No. 30). The Court has considered the papers submitted by the parties and has determined that oral argument is not necessary. The Court hereby finds and rules as follows.
II. BACKGROUND
Defendant, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”), is a voluntary, non-profit standard-setting association that promulgates the rules of competition for and operates annual national championships in 22 sports across three…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Agnew v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2008
- O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.