Legal Opinion
Gressley v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1961No. Civ. 24848PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants Harold H. Utschig and Balboa Oldsmobile, a corporation, entered on the sustaining of their demurrer to the sixth amended complaint. On the sustaining of the demurrer, counsel for plaintiff stated he did not desire to further amend and the demurrer was sustained without leave.
The sixth amended complaint is in three counts. The demurrer to counts I and II was general and special. The special demurrer was on the grounds of uncertainty, ambiguity, and unintelligibility. The demurrer to count III was general. Plaintiff contends each…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.