Legal Opinion
Turnbull for Turnbull v. Fink
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided August 9, 1994No. 79, 1994PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The Court has before it a motion by the Delaware Trial Lawyers Association (“DTLA”) to file an amicus curiae brief regarding the constitutionality of the limitations imposed by 2 Del.C. § 1329. The ap pellants have filed a joint opening brief. Pri- or to the filing of the appellants’ opening brief, this Court indicated that it was inclined to grant DTLA’s motion.
The appellants’ opening brief is problematic for the purpose of ruling on DTLA’s motion. The appellants’ opening brief states that they have declined to raise and argue the constitutionality of the limitations imposed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Stilwell v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Giammalvo v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Rossitto v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Ploof v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Loudon v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- VonFeldt v. Stifel Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.