Legal Opinion

Rossitto v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 9, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This appeal presents the questions of the constitutionality of the Gambling Paraphernalia Statute, 11 Del.C. § 669(a),1 and of Rule 8(2) 2, Del.C.Ann., of this Court.

The questions arise under appeals from denials by the Superior Court of post conviction relief sought by the defendant, under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a), Del.C.Ann. from two convictions for violations of 11 Del.C. § 669(a). One conviction gave rise to an appeal and an affirmance after the usual briefing and argument. See Del., 287 A.2d 669. An appeal from the other conviction resulted in a summary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ploof v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Turnbull for Turnbull v. FinkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API