Legal Opinion

VonFeldt v. Stifel Financial Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 7, 1998No. 357, 1997PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

This appeal challenges a decision of the Court of Chancery denying a corporate director’s request for indemnification and advance of legal fees and expenses. The Court of Chancery ruled that defendant corporation’s bylaws do not entitle plaintiff to be indemnified or to receive advance of legal fees and expenses. The trial court also ruled that no contract exists whereby defendant must pay for plaintiff’s defense in pending litigation. We reverse, in part, the former holding because we find that, under the bylaws, plaintiff is entitled to indemnification because…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Continental Insurance v. Rutledge & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  3. Siaca v. DCC Operating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. Stifel Financial Corp. v. CochranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API