Legal Opinion

Ploof v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 4, 2013No. 108, 2012PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice for the Majority:

In this appeal of a denial of a postconviction relief motion, we examine whether defense counsel were ineffective during a defendant’s first-degree murder trial. We hold that the attorneys’ alleged failure to consult with a forensic pathologist or toxicologist, to present more evidence regarding the victim’s dominant hand, to investigate ballistics issues, appeal certain issues, and to object to the dismissal of jurors who indicated that they could not impose the death penalty did not prejudice the defendant during his trial’s guilt phase. During the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  4. Ploof v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  5. Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API