State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. Whalen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We have held that an award of attorney fees in public records cases is discretionary and is to be determined by the presence of a public benefit conferred by relator seeking the disclosure. Moreover, since the award is punitive, reasonableness and good faith of the respondent in refusing to make disclosure may also be considered. State, ex rel. Fox, v. Cuyahoga Cty. Hosp. System (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 108, 529 N.E. 2d 443; State, ex rel. Mazzaro, v. Ferguson (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 37, 550 N.E. 2d 467.
In this case, the public benefit is manifest. Relator, a commercial television station,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Mazzaro v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co. v. Fostoria Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Jlg Industries, Inc., American Equipment Company, Hertz Equipment Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- State, Ex Rel. Petty v. WurstOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Doe v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.