Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Petty v. Wurst

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1989No. CA89-06-085PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter came on to be considered upon a complaint in mandamus and motion for summary judgment filed by relator, an answer and motion to dismiss filed by respondent, and upon the briefs and oral arguments of counsel.

On March 20, 1989, relator, Mark C. Petty, filed a request under the Ohio Public Records Act with respondent, Daniel S. Wurst, Butler County Auditor, for county payroll records for the years 1984 and 1988, including the name, classification or job title, salary rate and total compensation of each and every county employee paid from general funds as of those dates. Respondent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Jlg Industries, Inc., American Equipment Company, Hertz Equipment Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Foster v. City of KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Harmon v. Regions BankMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Clymer v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. WhalenOhio Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API