Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Doe v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2009No. 2008-2471PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandamus to compel appellees and cross-appellants, Pierce Township Police Chief James T. Smith and the Pierce Township Board of Trustees, to produce certain records relating to an alleged incident or offense and awarding appellant and cross-appellee, John Doe (“appellant”), statutory damages of $1,000, attorney fees of $2,000, and expenses in the amount of $500. We hold that the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in awarding statutory damages and attorney fees in the stated amounts and affirm the judgment.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wilborn v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Russell v. ThorntonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State Ex Rel. DiFranco v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. City of VermilionOhio Supreme Court · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API