Noble v. Bacon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment below entered on the jury’s verdict, in favor of plaintiff, for $10,000, assessed as damages for personal injuries. At the outset appellant admits that there is evidence which the jury had a right to believe which supports the implied finding that defendant was negligent. It therefore becomes unnecessary to discuss any conflict in the evidence or to do more than sketch the, facts, save as certain parts of the record become essential to illustrate the points presented.
The first claim of appellant is that the plaintiff was as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Handley v. LombardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Leblanc v. CoverdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vonault v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Kroplin v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Moffitt v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Turner v. MannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.