Legal Opinion

Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1924No. 24,120PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The action was to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, Lewis Iverson, alleged to have been due to the negligence of defendant causing one of its passenger trains to collide with the automobile in which he was riding, the car being driven by its owner, Ed Iverson, a brother of Lewis. The place of the fatal collision was where Central avenue in the village of Brooten is crossed by the main track of defendant’s railroad, and occurred at 2:08 p. m. on August…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Gowan v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Lawler v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Schroht v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API