Legal Opinion

Frankle v. Twedt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1951No. 35,353PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

As an outgrowth of a collision at Bast Seventh street and Forest avenue in St. Paul, plaintiff sued for damages to his automobile, and defendant answered and counterclaimed for damages to his vehicle. At the time of the accident, plaintiff’s foster brother, Harold Schmit, was driving plaintiff’s automobile and was on his *44way, pursuant to a previous understanding, to pick up plaintiff at his place of employment. Defendant was driving his own car.

We are faced with the question whether, in the light of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Ossenfort Ex Rel. Ossenfort v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Swigerd v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API