Legal Opinion

Gowan v. McAdoo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1919No. 21,265PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Action in the district court for Carlton county, to recover $3,000 for injuries received by plaintiff’s minor son. The answer alleged that the driver of the vehicle was incompetent and that his carelessness and negligence caused the collision.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Carlton county, to recover $3,000 for injuries received by plaintiff’s minor son. The answer alleged that the driver of the vehicle was incompetent and that his carelessness and negligence caused the collision. The case was tried before Dancer, J., and a juryjvhich answered in the affirmative these questions: Whether defendant was negligent in the maintenance of the planking between the- rails; whether defendant gave proper signals by blowing the whistle and ringing the bell; whether the train was run at a negligent rate of speed; whether defendant was…

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

At Barnum in this state, on February 1, 1918, a sleigh carrying school children to their homes was struck at a grade crossing by the engine of a passenger train of the Northern Pacific Eailway Company. Seven of the children were killed and others were injured. A number of actions -were brought against the company on account of the accident. Among them was one hy -plaintiff in behalf of his minor son, who was injured. There was a verdict in his favor, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.

After the verdict was returned, on the application of the railway company, an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Murphy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Smith v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Smith v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Vills v. City of CloquetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  5. Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API