Legal Opinion
McDaniels v. Dickey
California Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12810PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of the defendants G. W. Dickey, Loraine Dickey and Charles K. Heard to appellant’s complaint.
The complaint alleges, in effect, that on February 20, 1928, an action.in eminent domain was commenced by the City of Los Angeles against G. W. Dickey, Loraine Dickey and others as the owners of a parcel of property described in the complaint in condemnation; that thereafter and on the seventeenth day of May, 1929, an interlocutory judgment was entered in book 730 at page 80 of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- California Southern Railroad v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Security Co. v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Russakov v. the McCarthy Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wickwire v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Bellflower City School District v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Los Angeles v. DeaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Bank of America v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.