Legal Opinion

City of Santa Barbara v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1966No. Civ. 30194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding with a new trial after order granting a motion for a new trial.

Petitioner is the plaintiff in an action in eminent domain commenced in the respondent court designated as number 71624 and entitled “City of Santa Barbara, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Crocker-Citizens National Bank, a national banking association, as successor trustee under the Will of Antonio J. Orella, Deceased, et al, Defendants. '' The purpose of the action was to acquire a parcel of real property to be used by the plaintiff City…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Quevedo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency v. IrvingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Ruiz v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Hansen's Truck Stop, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API