City of Santa Barbara v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *
Prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding with a new trial after order granting a motion for a new trial.
Petitioner is the plaintiff in an action in eminent domain commenced in the respondent court designated as number 71624 and entitled “City of Santa Barbara, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Crocker-Citizens National Bank, a national banking association, as successor trustee under the Will of Antonio J. Orella, Deceased, et al, Defendants. '' The purpose of the action was to acquire a parcel of real property to be used by the plaintiff City…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Quevedo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency v. IrvingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ruiz v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Hansen's Truck Stop, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.