Legal Opinion
Sirott v. Latts
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1992No. B054536PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.—
plaintiff, Stanley Sirott, M.D., appeals from judgment dismissing his action for legal malpractice as to defendants Leatrice Latts and Latts & Herstead after their general demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend on the ground the action is barred by limitations.1
Facts
The action was commenced January 31, 1990.
Limited to material facts, and without its contentions, deductions and conclusions of fact or law (see Serrano v. Priest (1971) 5 Cal.3d 584, 591 [96 Cal.Rptr. 601, 487 P.2d 1241, 41 A.L.R.3d 1187]), the first amended complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- ITT Small Business Finance Corp. v. NilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Radovich v. Locke-PaddonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.