Legal Opinion

Carrasco v. Bankoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1963No. Civ. 26949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiffs sued Carobil Hospital, Dr. Novick, administrator, and Dr. Bankoff, chief surgeon, for negligence in the care and treatment of a minor for third-degree burns. Judgment for $35,000 in favor of Gilbert and $6,500 in favor of his father was entered on a jury verdict.

Indulging in an extensive factual argument which has no place in a reviewing court (Overton v. Vita-Food Corp., 94 Cal.App.2d 367 [210 P.2d 757]; Crawford v. Southern Pac. Co., 3 Cal.2d 427 [45 P.2d 183]; Estate of Bristol, 23 Cal.2d 221 [143 P.2d 689]) and devoting their briefs exclusively to those portions of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
  2. Tompkins v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Ahrentzen v. WestburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Flores v. LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API