Carrasco v. Bankoff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiffs sued Carobil Hospital, Dr. Novick, administrator, and Dr. Bankoff, chief surgeon, for negligence in the care and treatment of a minor for third-degree burns. Judgment for $35,000 in favor of Gilbert and $6,500 in favor of his father was entered on a jury verdict.
Indulging in an extensive factual argument which has no place in a reviewing court (Overton v. Vita-Food Corp., 94 Cal.App.2d 367 [210 P.2d 757]; Crawford v. Southern Pac. Co., 3 Cal.2d 427 [45 P.2d 183]; Estate of Bristol, 23 Cal.2d 221 [143 P.2d 689]) and devoting their briefs exclusively to those portions of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Tompkins v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ahrentzen v. WestburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Flores v. LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021