Legal Opinion

Williams v. Prostaff Temporaries

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1999No. 98-1443PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

On October 14, 1995, while working at Amoco Foam, a temporary job obtained through appellee, Prostaff Temporaries, appellant, Michelle Williams, injured her back while moving a stack of foam plates. After receiving treatment for this injury, appellant was released to return to work without limitations and after returning to work appellant sought additional treatment and temporary total disability benefits. The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission denied these requests and we affirm. Our jurisdiction is authorized pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule 2-4 (1998).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Jeter v. B.R. McGinty MechanicalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Whaley v. Hardee'sCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Willmon v. Allen Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. State v. GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. SSI, INC. v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Wallace v. West Fraser South, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Kimbell v. Association of Rehab Industry & Business Companion Property & CasualtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API